This last Sunday, the Episcopal Church elected Katherine Jefferts Schori to be its presiding bishop. Bishop Schori will be the first female presiding bishop in church history.
Much is being written about how fractious this election will be. This CNN.com article quotes a number of conservative Anglicans who are troubled by Schori's election, including The Rev. Canon Chris Sugden, a leader of the Anglican Mainstream, who said Bishop Schori's election:
...shows that the Episcopal leadership is going to do what they want to do regardless of what it means to the rest of the communion.
I'm not sure I see what it should mean to the rest of the communion. At most it would seem that it will require the other
primates in
the communion to interact with a woman as an equal. Is that really asking too much?
FWIW, here are the details of the vote:
26th Presiding Bishop election results from the House of Bishops and House of Deputies
I regret that other members of the communion consider issues of gender and sexuality so critical when, as Bishop Schori noted in her first press conference, there are more pressing issues:
When a reporter asked how the "average Anglican who is a black woman under 30, earns two dollars a day and is evangelical," might react to news of her consecration and to her consent to Gene Robinson's consecration, she responded: "If the average Anglican is as you describe, she is dealing with hunger, inadequate housing, unclean water and unavailability of education. Those are the places I would start. The issue of sexuality comes along much higher on the hierarchy of needs."
[Episcopal News Service: Jefferts Schori's 'Reign of God']
Recent Comments